This is just a break away from my normal posts to post an honest opinion….OK it’s actually a rant to be more specific, after some frustrating reading on some public beer review sites, sites like Rate Beer and Beer Advocate for example. If you do not like rants, please disregard this post all together. But, I have noticed a trend on these sites, more so than you see even in the beer blogger community which seems to be made fun of from time to time. That trend? A hardcore elitist attitude towards beer and a general bashing of any beer that is not big, bold, exuberant. Now, don’t get me wrong and jump down my throat right away, I’m not saying all of the people on these sites are that way, I would say 2 out of 5 people who post on there actually seem to understand beer and beer styles, and the reason behind them. When I read someone post a bashing review of a cream ale, then say “It’s no Pliney the Younger”, I say….well duh!
It really gets under my skin to read reviews of beers that are clearly within style, clearly brewed well, then bashed because they are not hoppy enough or big enough even when the beer is not intended to be hoppy or big. Then to read about beers that I know are just brewed to be innovative and new, and get rave reviews from these people just because they are the newest fad. Again, I am not knocking the breweries for brewing them, or people who drink them. Hell, I am one of those guys myself. But you need to take a beer for what it is and judge or review it fairly. Something it seems so many of these self-proclaimed “beer connoisseurs” lack the ability to do. Below are is a sampling of some interesting numbers I gathered from Beer Advocate and the scores for the top rated beers for these styles. See if you notice a trend.
Standard American Lager (Adjunct Lager): Highest Rated Score=84
Cream Ale: Highest Rated Score=88
Light Lager: Highest Rated Score=81
Low Alcohol Beer: Highest Rated Score=77
American Amber/Red: Highest Rate Score=87
Euro Lager (like Becks, Heineken, St. Pauly Girl, ect): Highest Rated Score=87
English Barleywine: Highest Rated Score=100
American Barleywine: Highest Rated Score=96
American IPA: Highest Rated Score=98
Belgian Dark Strong: Highest Rated Score=96
Oud Bruin: Highest Rated Score=94
Belgian Lambic: Highest Rated Score=99
Now I chose the beers categories above for one reason, one group is considered “trash” by the elitist beer snob, the other group is the biggest of the big, the boldest of the bold, or considered styles that only “those in the know” would find appealing, like the sour beers. See the difference? Do you mean to tell me the BEST CREAM ALE in the world is at best a 88 out of 100? Look at those poor low alcohol beers? Not a good one in the bunch. I find that hard to believe if you were taking a beer for what it is supposed to be, the best of that style will always be world class examples of that style. Something many of the type who frequent these websites don’t seem to understand. If you are to consider yourself a connoisseur, you need to understand and respect a beer for what it is, not what you think is worthy of your palate.
With that said, there are some bloggers out there who will call a light lager garbage, or say they suck. I just don’t buy into that mentality. Granted, they are not my go to beer styles either because they just don’t excite me, but if I am going to review one, or judge one in competition, I will take the beer for what it is supposed to be. That is how a beer review should be done, regardless of whether or not you like it, as long as you judged it according to style, that is all that matters. I am NOT saying every beer is worthy of praise and bad beers should not be called bad beers. I feel the Alstrom Brothers from Beer Advocate do a great job of that, the members of their website, not so much. I have read some great, fair, and honest reviews according to what the beer is supposed to be. I respect those people for doing so. But sadly the elitists seem to outnumber the competent ones on there. If you are offended by that statement, all I can do is apologize and say you must be part of the problem, because if you are doing a fair review for what the beer is, then you should not be offended at all. Also, I must add that I am not talking about the forums or conversations going on in there, I am talking strictly the beer reviews.
Bloggers also are not free from guilt on that matter. I have read several reviews that made me think, “What the hell were you comparing that beer to?” because I have read some reviews on some blogs that could be reviewing an English IPA for example, then according to their review list some of the attributes one would expect in an English Style IPA, like a nice malt backbone, moderate hop flavor, aroma, and bitterness and so on, then go on to say it’s one of the worst IPA’s they have ever had. It’s my opinion that you cannot compare an English IPA to an American IPA and bash it for being an English IPA. Sorry, but that’s like bashing the delicious chicken dish you ordered because you prefer steak.What really is even worse is when only beer from a certain brewery’s is considered good. That also gets me going. LOL.
In the end, my point is, not every beer is good and not every craft beer is great; but you do need to evaluate it according to what it is, not what style you prefer and every other beer that does not fit that flavor/aroma profile is a crappy beer. That’s just not fair evaluation. If you are or want to be a beer judge, you do need to let go of that mindset.











































































